Hillary in Debt Up to Her Fake Smile
May 21, 2008
Looks like the Hilldebeest just doesn’t know when to quit and cut her losses. Can you imagine this woman at a blackjack table? She’d start betting clothing after a while just to stay in…and how disturbing is that?
The actual total debt of her campaign, as reported in the campaign finance filing for April, is $10 million in loans to herself plus $9.48 million in unpaid bills.
Additionally, campaign officials said the New York senator gave herself another $1.4 million loan in May, producing a total current debt of $20.88 million. But the latest loan that occurred in May will not show up on finance filings until next month.
Guess those diehard feminazis who claim poor Hillary is the victim of those hairy, nasty, chauvinistic piggy males are out of cash to keep donating. Maybe they used their pennies to pay for batteries.
Bush Makes Remarks About Appeasers and Angers…The Appeasers
May 16, 2008
Everyone’s up in arms about the comments President Bush made while at the Knesset in Israel. Pelosi’s whining that it’s “beneath the office of the President,” Biden’s coming unglued, and all the Dems are lining up behind to slap someone’s wrist and say “poo on you.”
What’s the horrible quote in question?
“Some seem to believe we should negotiate with terrorists and radicals, as if some ingenious argument will persuade them they have been wrong all along,” Bush said in an address to the Knesset, the Israeli parliament, on Thursday. “We have heard this foolish delusion before. As Nazi tanks crossed into Poland in 1939, an American senator declared: ‘Lord, if only I could have talked to Hitler, all of this might have been avoided.’ We have an obligation to call this what it is - the false comfort of appeasement, which has been repeatedly discredited by history.”
What’s the ruckus about? I say amen, amen, and kudos to Bush for saying it. Of course, it’s a bit late, since anti-war appeasement Dems are about as out of control as can be. But the sentiment is nice.
Hillary Loans Herself $6.4 Million and Other Campaign Idiocy
May 7, 2008
FOX reports that Sen. Hildebeast Clinton loaned herself $6.4 million in the last month to keep her struggling campaign afloat. The pundits are so busy talking about her chances against Obamination that it seems everyone’s missing the most obvious question of all: How in blazes is that bimbo expected to do anything with the national budget when she can’t manage her own campaign? And she wants the government to pay for healthcare too? Is she going to loan herself funds for that? And who’s going to reimburse her for these loans?
Wake up, people. She’s a freaking idiot, and if people stopped cooing over the whole woman-or-black-guy thing, they’d realize that Obama and his competition are about as useful as teats on a boar. I haven’t said much about the election because I’ve been so disgusted with it all, but I suppose it’s time to just lay it out on the line.
First of all, you have Obama, who’s a piece of dog crap disguised as the Great Minority Hope. He’s vague enough to pick up the votes of the uninformed (Who doesn’t like “hope” and “change?”), but crazy enough to pick the nutroots’ vote. If he actually gets in the White House, I will have lost all faith in the ability of this nation to last another 5 years. And yes, I’m serious.
Then you have Hillary Clinton, who spells her last name c-o-r-r-u-p-t-b-i-t-c-h. I’d love to say that no one really takes this woman seriously, but then I read up on some of the comments left by Hilldebeast hopefuls around the net. These people live in a fantasyland so deep that it makes Willy Wonka look like a realist. She’s approaching that phase I call “Ronpaulism,” which is characterized by people looking at your campaign and saying, “Sweety, doesn’t anyone love you enough to tell you to go home?”
The crown jewel of this election, however, is McCain, who is only conservative if you somehow forgot what being a conservative means. I will vote for the idiot only because I’d rather die than see one of the Wonder Twins elected. That being said, it confuses me to no end that you have bloggers calling themselves “conservative” and yet honestly believing McCain is worth putting in the White House on his own merit and not as a stopgap for the Democratic World Defeatist Tour.
This is from McLoony’s site:
He is a common sense conservative who believes in a strong national defense, a smaller, more accountable government, economic growth and opportunity, the dignity of life and traditional values.
Common sense? How is it common sense to allow illegals anything in our country besides swift deportation and/or punishments for border jumping that actually deter the little losers from coming over to begin with?
How is it common sense to go behind the back of the people and the rest of Congress to broker deals with the other side instead of standing for what’s right?
How is it common sense to say that we cannot do what needs to be done in order to gain information from terrorists that would save American lives?
I’ll save you the suspense. It’s not common sense. It’s self-promoting, kiss-butt machinations designed to ingratiate himself with as many people as possible. McCain’s not a conservative, he’s a politician in every sense of the word, groomed and thrust down our throats by the media, who shaped the race from day one to ensure the actually qualified candidates (read: men with balls) were weeded out due to lack of visibility. (Do you know who Duncan Hunter is? I rest my case.)
I’ll say this very plainly: You cannot call yourself a true conservative and ACTUALLY support McCain at the same time–unless your only point in supporting him is to keep Tweedledee and Tweedledum out of the candy jar. And for all you blogs out there who think McCain is anything less than the bottom of the conservative barrel, bring your facts and we’ll debate. I’ll even give you airtime on the radio show.
DNC Ad Shows U.S. Soldiers Being Blown Up
April 30, 2008
If this doesn’t get your blood boiling, I’m not sure what will.
The Democratic National Committee has sparked outrage among veterans and others across the internet by running an anti-John McCain ad that shows U.S. soldiers being blown up.
After the new ad’s voice-over castigated McCain for suggesting that the United States may stay in Iraq for “maybe 100” years, the footage becomes shocking.
The DNC ad then shows an explosive device detonating near two soldiers standing beside a palm tree. The two soldiers disappear in an explosive fireball. The video also shows images of burning vehicles.
The fact that Dems would even THINK of using the deaths of two American soldiers to further their defeatist political agenda makes me want to put THEM by a palm tree with an IED. The thing is, they’re gleeful about it. They’re unapologetic. Do they not get that those soldiers are someone’s husband and father and brother and son? What kind of ghouls are these people?
Anti-war students disrupt career fair at UC Santa Cruz
April 24, 2008
Antiwar students are out showing their idiotic lack of coherent thought processes again.
SANTA CRUZ – Performing a spoof on TV award shows, a dozen students opposed to military recruiters disrupted a UC Santa Cruz career fair Tuesday, giving Marine and Army officers certificates for being “the best manipulator of sexuality” and telling “the most lies in advertising.”
The Students Against War demonstration, which followed a rally and march of 100 activists, was tame compared to a 2005 clash that led UCSC to close the event. No injuries were reported and no arrests were made Tuesday.
There’s a great editorial here on the event. Perhaps not everyone over there is stupid.
Protest organizers say their goal this year was to engage people in nonviolent civil protest and not to shut down the career fair because they believe students should have the choice to talk to military recruiters if they want.
We find that talk encouraging — though the words ring hollow. Another of the protesters told a reporter that “military recruiters aren’t welcome here.”
Which is it?
We’d also like to ask protesters if they do not want recruiters targeting uneducated minorities, why protest a job fair on a college campus?
We expect college campuses to be hotbeds of free speech. We encourage it. Heck, it’s our stock in trade. But we like to listen to, and give a voice to, myriad opinions.
Protesters ought to give it a try.
University to students: ‘All whites are racist’
November 2, 2007
Here’s a tidbit straight from the bowels of hell liberals call “intelligent and enlightened thought:”
A mandatory University of Delaware program requires residence hall students to acknowledge that “all whites are racist” and offers them “treatment” for any incorrect attitudes regarding class, gender, religion, culture or sexuality they might hold upon entering the school, according to a civil rights group.
“Somehow, the University of Delaware seems terrifyingly unaware that a state-sponsored institution of higher education in the United States does not have the legal right to engage in a program of systematic thought reform. The First Amendment protects the right to freedom of conscience – the right to keep our innermost thoughts free from governmental intrusion. It also protects the right to be free from compelled speech,” said a letter from Samantha Harris, director of legal and public advocacy for The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education to university President Patrick Harker.
The organization cited excerpts from the university’s Office of Residence Life Diversity Education Training documents, including the statement:
“A RACIST: A racist is one who is both privileged and socialized on the basis of race by a white supremacist (racist) system. ‘The term applies to all white people (i.e., people of European descent) living in the United States, regardless of class, gender, religion, culture or sexuality. By this definition, people of color cannot be racists, because as peoples within the U.S. system, they do not have the power to back up their prejudices, hostilities, or acts of discrimination….’”
The education program also notes that “reverse racism” is “a term created and used by white people to deny their white privilege.” And “a non-racist” is called “a non-term,” because, the program explains, “The term was created by whites to deny responsibility for systemic racism, to maintain an aura of innocence in the face of racial oppression, and to shift the responsibility for that oppression from whites to people of color (called ‘blaming the victim’).”
I don’t even know what to say to this. It’s the dumbest thing I’ve ever heard. And then people still have the nerve to say that the higher education system isn’t f’ed up.
Flag-Folding Recitation Banned in Cemeteries Nationwide
October 26, 2007
By JOE VARGO
The Press-Enterprise
Through thousands of military burials, Memorial Honor Detail volunteers at Riverside National Cemetery have folded the American flag 13 times and recited the significance of every fold to survivors of those being laid to rest.
The first fold, a narrator tells relatives, represents life, the second a belief in eternal life.
The 11th fold celebrates Jewish war veterans and “glorifies the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac and the God of Jacob.”
A single complaint lodged against the words for the 11th fold recently prompted the National Cemetery Administration to ban the entire recital at all 125 national cemeteries.
A spokesman in Washington said the complaint originated from someone who witnessed the ceremony at Riverside National but would provide no other details and declined to release the directive banning the flag-folding recital, saying it was “an internal working document not meant for public distribution.”
Well, I would think so. Liberals really need lives.
The Moonbats and the Robot Bugs
October 15, 2007
Dear God, Misha cracks me up…but the story is hilarious too.
Miller = Queer Beer
October 14, 2007
This column is reason #4,762 why I have an intellectual crush on Vox Day. That, and he’s cute.
“Choose this day whom you will serve,” Joshua once asked the people of Israel. The Miller Brewing Company, when asked to make a similar decision, preferred to serve alcohol to catamites instead of Catholics, as evidenced by their decision to sponsor the Folsom Street Fair in Sodom-by-the-Bay last week. It is, of course, perfectly legal for Miller to wave their Genuine Draft banner proudly over the scenes of bald men in leather whipping the bare bottoms of other bald men in leather; it seems Miller is determined to identify its product with a short-lived, disease-ridden, non-propagating minority who represent at most two percent of the population.
The paragraph above is also Reason #459 why I drink Budweiser. Well, that and Miller tastes like what I assume the north end of a southbound dog would resemble.
No More Mom and Dad in School
October 14, 2007
If this isn’t disgusting, I don’t know what is. And one more thing–if anyone is out there still calling The Governator a freaking conservative, they need their head examined.
CCF noted that now on a banned list will be any text, reference or teaching aid that portrays marriage as only between a man and woman, materials that say people are born male or female (and not in between), sources that fail to include a variety of transsexual, bisexual and homosexual historical figures, and sex education materials that fail to offer the option of sex changes.
Further, homecoming kings now can be either male or female – as can homecoming queens, and students, whether male or female, must be allowed to use the restroom and locker room corresponding to the sex with which they choose to identify.
AB394 promotes the same issues through state-funded publications, postings, curricula and handouts to students, parents and teachers.
It also creates the circumstances where a parent who says marriage is only for a man and a woman in the presence of a lesbian teacher could be convicted of “harassment,” and a student who believes people are born either male or female could be reported as a “harasser” by a male teacher who wears women’s clothes, CCF said.
Thomasson said Schwarzenegger also signed AB14, which prohibits state funding for any program that does not support a range of alternative sexual practices, including state-funded social services run by churches.
Gathering of Eagles Hacked
October 14, 2007
As many of you may already know, the Gathering of Eagles website was hacked and taken down by a Denial of Service attack two days ago. Thankfully, our hosting company (HostGator–highly recommended) was quite personable and worked with us over several hours to rectify the problem. Total downtime was only about 12 hours, with no harm done.
While the question of “Who would do such a thing?” is as stupid as the answer is obvious, allow me to give you a hint. The attacks came only hours after we posted the juicy tidbit that Adam Kokesh, idiot extraordinaire and head of Iraq Veterans Against the War, made public threats against Chris Hill, GOE’s National Director of Operations. Titled “Heaven Help This Guy If I Run Into Him On The Street,” the post could have been written by an 8-year-old, filled with not only a litany of stupidity but outright lies about the scuffle between Eagles and nutjob-turned-Gold Star Father Carlos Arredondo. Let’s not forget that Carlos, upon being told his Marine son had willingly sacrificed himself for his nation, promptly attempted to set himself on fire inside the Marine Corps van outside his home.
[Side note: It really chaps my butt when idiots like Cindy Sheehan and Carlos Arredondo use the willing and noble sacrifice their sons make in order to gain political points with the communists trying to destroy our nation. It chaps my butt even more when the Communists use already emotionally unstable wackos like these two to further their agenda. "What, Carlos? You want to drag a coffin with an upside-down flag and your son's photo down the street like a Red Rider wagon? Of course! In fact, your press conference is at 3. Go see the makeup guy, dear. And it's okay if you act crazy. That's good press."]
How do I know Kokesh is lying? I was there, remember? I know better than most what happened that day. But Kokesh is less concerned with facts than whipping up the peaceniks into a righteous frenzy. Because, of course, God knows they support the troops and love Gold Star families. In fact, let’s not forget that the antiwar movement loves the troops so much they gave $600,000 in cash and medical supplies to them. Oh, wait. That was actually aid to the terrorists we’re fighting. Oops. Well, they gathered in D.C. by the thousands to honor the sacrifices of those Gold Star families by reading the names of the fallen…oh, wait. No they didn’t. They used the names of the fallen as props for a “die-in” that resulted in almost 200 arrests while some of the parents of those heroes watched in agony and rage that their sons’ names were being trashed by the very people they died for.
And then people wonder why conservatives can’t stand liberals.
The Next Haditha
October 6, 2007
By now you’ve probably heard about the ruckus this week in Iraq, when U.S. forces killed 25 in an airstrike on a town north of Baghdad. The NY Times can barely contain its glee, with headlines like “Accounts Differ Sharply on U.S. Attack in Iraq.” Don’t you just love that? “U.S. Attack.” If you read the actual account of what happened, it was hardly an “attack.” More like a stomping out of a bunch of holed-up terrorists who were using everything from RPGs to automatic weapons and even an anti-aircraft missile. They were advancing on U.S. troops. What exactly do these idiots in our country expect our guys to do?
Yes, it sounds like civilians were killed. But let’s stop and think for a moment. Which insurgents aren’t civilians? In fact, I challenge you to find me any of the enemy over there wearing uniforms. That means that yes, every time U.S. soldiers take a life, that life–however worthless and savage it is–is a civilian. There is no military enemy. How many times do we need to go over this? And yes, children die in war. I’ll tell you what. When liberals stop advocating that it’s okay to murder their OWN unborn children, I’ll stop telling them to shut the f— up about the children of terrorist sympathizers.
And let’s take a look at the Times’ article. Written by Alissa J. Rubin, an American reporter who resides in France and recently moved from the LA Times to the NY Times, the article has all the hallmarks of a typical liberal media offering. In fact, some cursory research into Rubin’s writings on the Middle East show not only a distinct anti-American bias, but her work is posted at several militant anti-war group websites, including Why War? Not only that, but the contributors to the article include Khalid al-Ansary and Qais Mizher from Baghdad, and “an Iraqi employee of The New York Times from Diyala Province.” Wow. I wonder where their allegiance is. And this “employee…?” Can you say “terrorist sympathizer stringer?” I sure can.
So. Let’s get out the list of things you need to start the now-all-too-familiar media frenzy:
- Large photo showing dead body and grieving Iraqi, that may or may not actually be from the incident in question…check.
- Headline that characterizes the incident as an “attack” and breathlessly insinuates that U.S. troops lied about the events…check.
- Mention of plural “witnesses” that may be terrorists themselves…check.
- Article structure that paints the military as trying to cover its six after making a huge tactical error…check.
Well, I guess we have all the elements in place. All we need now is a member of Congress to denounce the troops, more media to pick it up, and we’ll have another Haditha–another group of our finest warriors and defenders, dragged under the bus of political expediency and appeasement until their lives and honor are gone, and all that’s left is a tarnished name and the bitter knowledge that they were innocent.
Well, over my dead body.
Hypocrisy, Thy Name is Liberal
October 5, 2007
In the wake of Democrats whining about Rush and his comments regarding antiwar “vets,” I was pleased to see the following list show up in my email from a good friend of mine.
Those of us not suffering from BDS already know about these incidents. Of course, since Democrats have notoriously short memories, they only remember what they said yesterday. Come tomorrow, they won’t remember that either, because they’ll have a new position. At any rate, let’s get started.
Why is everyone mad at Rush for having the balls to call out these idiots who spit in the face of the country they once served? I’m not sure why Dems are angry…it’s not like they’ve never insulted the troops. Let’s take a look…
Senator John Kerry flips the bird at Washington war vets
Wesley Clark Implies Troops ‘Bust Down’ Doors And ‘Rough Up’ Women
What about that hack with glasses who was on Law & Order who called the troops dumb kids who know less about Iraq than he b/c he reads 10 newspapers a day?
Disgraceful Anti-Military Blog at Daily Kos: Armed Forces Creating Serial Killers
Rosie Makes up Facts and Smears Volunteer Soldiers
Hundreds of anti-war liberals at Seattle Central Community College surrounded a pair of recruiters and hurled insults and objects at them until security had to escort the two of them off of campus.
The moonbats, who claim to “oppose the war but support the troops”, burned an American soldier in effigy in Portland.
19% of Democrats Say World Would Be Better Off With US Defeat In Iraq; Another 20% Aren’t Sure
Shumer: the violence in Anbar has gone down despite the surge, not because of the surge
Keep in mind the above list was about 20% of the email I was sent. Yes, there are that many instances. Therefore, once again we learn that liberals are idiots who are capable of nothing more than stealing oxygen from those of us with a clue.
Rosie Turns Down Terrorist Group’s Invite
October 4, 2007
The Queen of the Loonybin herself, Rosie O’Donnell, was invited to go to the Middle East and hang out with Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigades, a Middle East terror group.
“I agree with what this O’Donnell says. … We welcome Rosie O’Donnell to stay among us and to get to know the truth from being here, like many American peace activists are doing,” said Ala Senakreh, West Bank chief of the Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigades terrorist organization. [...] “[She can report to Americans that] we are not in love with killing, we like peace, we are human beings, it is the occupation that obliges us to do what we do,” Senakreh said.
One of O’Donnell’s minions apparently called the invite “absurd,” and said she wouldn’t be taking them up on their offer.
She’s not scared of the terrorists, mind you. She’s not worried about what they do to lesbians and homosexuals, and she doesn’t think anyone should be afraid of terrorists, but she’s not interested in going to the Middle East and coming face to face with the object of her misdirected affections, either.
Rosie, you’re a cowardly, pig-faced piece of liberal trash. If you’re not going to lead by example and get your butt out there to say hi to the Muzzies, then shut your face.



