Media Matter’s Alter Ego?
October 31, 2007
One Media Matters-like organization is already too many. It appears as though there’s another liberal apologist blog out there. Their name is News Hounds. The post that caught my attention dealt with last weekend’s interview of Justin and Darryl Sharraltt on Hannity’s America. To say that their post didn’t attempt to refute Justin’s story is understatement. In fact, they jump right into criticizing Mr. Hannity:
Last night’s (October 27th) Hannity’s America was a strange magazine format which combined stories about mediums and haunted houses with a lead off interview that was billed as “The Truth About Haditha.” Hannity is a college drop out with no professional journalism credentials and this lack of professional journalistic acumen was well reflected in Hannity’s “leading questions” which served a political agenda. (Comment: Although Fox’s Chris Wallace can be partisan, he looks like Cronkite compared to Sean Hannity!)
Hannity billed his interview with Lance Corporal Justin Sharratt, his lawyer, and his father as “exclusive.” He began by noting that this interview would be a response to Congressman John Murtha and military officials who are “trying to paint the story with a different brush.” Before the interview began, Hannity set up the Fox/right wing premise by asking the not so rhetorical question “have politics gotten in the way of patriotism?” Without doing an overview of the Haditha story, he asked Sharratt to explain what happened on that fateful day. Hannity asked Sharratt if he saw any of his fellow Marines doing anything that they weren’t supposed to do. Not surprisingly, Sharratt said that he didn’t. Hannity mentioned the article in Time Magazine which reported that the Haditha civilians claimed they were attacked by the Marines. Hannity asked Sharratt why Time would report that and Sharratt said he didn’t know.
You’ll notice that Newshounds doesn’t mention Capt. Jeffrey Dinsmore’s sworn testimony. I posted about Capt. Dinsmore’s testimony in a post titled A Timline Emerges back in July. Here’s what I posted then:
As previously reported by NewsMax, the battalion S2 officer made a full and complete report based on his monitoring of the day’s events and the intelligence he and others had amassed then and previous days. As we wrote at the time, the PowerPoint after-action report he sent up the command ladder proved to all the higher officers that the incident warranted no further investigation.
I also mentioned these important details that should’ve been included in NewsHounds’s post: [Read more]














Recent Comments
Gekster: Dave V; Please tell me how long you have been doing colonoscopies on yourself with your own eyes and not the...
Gekster: Mr. Relevant Rhino. I will take position on #5. I will agree with the expansion of Government. But by...
Dave V: Whats it like to be a female in the KKK Ms. Lange? If you could spew just a little more hate, I guess I may...
David M: The Thunder Run has linked to this post in the - Web Reconnaissance for 12/01/2008 A short recon of what’s...
Relevant Rhino: Just a few thoughts, although I’m very, very glad you compiled this list. 1) The proposal for...
Gekster: yeaaaaaaaaaaa!! !!!!!! here’s something to get things warmed up. ooooooraaaaaaaa hhhhhhh...
newrepublican: Good morning. I saw your blog listed in urbanconservati ve. I just started my blog recently, the New...
SUE: GREAT POST
Unhappy American: Finally! Someone who has told the truth about the hypocrisy of the 2008 elections. I am one...
SUE: Very well said. These are all the things I would have said and some I have said. You are right on with these...